Comparative study of sperm washing and selection methods after cryopreservation and its influence on sperm subpopulational structure in a bovine model.
The effect of different sperm washing-selection methods on sperm morphometric characteristics as a study to detect differences in the subpopulational structure has been carried out in detail in a bovine model. Cryopreserved sperm samples from 5 bulls were thawed, pooled, and processed by TALP-washin...
Guardado en:
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículos |
| Lenguaje: | eng |
| Publicado: |
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositorio.educacionsuperior.gob.ec/handle/28000/2714 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The effect of different sperm washing-selection methods on sperm morphometric characteristics as a study to detect differences in the subpopulational structure has been carried out in detail in a bovine model. Cryopreserved sperm samples from 5 bulls were thawed, pooled, and processed by TALP-washing centrifugation method (TWCM), selective Percoll discontinuous density-gradient centrifugation method (PDGM), and self-migration swim-up separation method (SUMM). Live-dead assay (SYBR-14/ethidium homodimer-1), chlortetracycline assay (CTC), and sperm motility were assessed, and aliquots of sperm were processed for automated sperm morphometry analysis (ASMA) simultaneously before (raw thawed sperm used as control, RTS) and after different sperm washing-selection techniques. Deleterious effects of different methods were evident, particularly on sperm membrane integrity (p?<?0.05) and capacitation status (p?<?0.05). Moreover, each cell was measured for four primary dimensional parameters, and three shape parameters. All sperm morphometric parameters evaluated were analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) and multivariate clustering analyses. PCA revealed two principal components for each sperm washing or separation method explaining more than the 91% of the variance. The number of subpopulations found was the same for all methods (four) except for PDGM (three). However, irrespective of the number of subpopulations defined by PCA and clustering analyses, the sperm subpopulational structure was found to be different and strongly influenced by the sperm selection procedure due to statistical differences found regarding the sperm biophysical changes induced by each method used (p?<?0.001). It is concluded that different sperm washing-selection methods commonly used during IVF process, may lead to alterations in sperm morphometric characteristics, which might explain the different results seen after IVF, since an important influence of these methods on sperm subpopulational structure has been demonstrated. |
|---|