Responsibility to protect and its role during the humanitarian intervention to end the 210/2011 post-electoral crisis in Ivory Cost
Military intervention has been a controversial issue that carries out a responsibility for International Governmental Organizations and countries carrying it. The international community debates with guilt for not doing enough to stop massacres and interventions gone wrong. The principle of Respo...
Guardado en:
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Tesis de Pregrado |
| Publicado: |
Quito, 2013
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositorio.usfq.edu.ec/handle/23000/3063 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Military intervention has been a controversial issue that carries out a responsibility for
International Governmental Organizations and countries carrying it. The international
community debates with guilt for not doing enough to stop massacres and interventions
gone wrong. The principle of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) calls for protection of
civilians when its state has failed to do so. This thesis analyzes the case of Ivory Coast,
where this principle proved to be key in order to avoid further bloodshed on the Postelectoral
crisis between 2010/2011 and how the role of a Security Council member helped
for intervention to arrive in the nick of time. |
|---|